Alternatives to Using Tetrochloroethylene  

 People with a long memory of drycleaning may remember when professional cleaning was done in centralized locations using benzene, carbon tetrachloride, or petroleum solvents, as well as water, and the neighborhood cleaning shop was a drop off point often with tailoring the main on-site occupation. Turn-around time was generally a week or more.

After the Second World War, consumers demanded faster turnaround. To meet this, the industry decentralized. The introduction of perc helped: here was a solvent which was non-flammable and safe to handle, and which used equipment economical enough to be installed in the neighborhood drycleaning shop. Same-day service became a reality.

Since that time, perc drycleaning has been able to carry drycleaners through a variety 
of changes in fashion -- even including the polyester leisure suit. The 1990s have brought a new health and environmental challenge. New methods of tracing extremely small quantities of chemicals in the environment -- in urban air, groundwater, soil and the atmosphere of both the workplace and the home -- have led to stringent laws governing waste emissions and waste disposal. And they have led to consumer advocacy groups who call for no trace chemicals in the environment.
Advantages of perc;
     Perchloroethylene has been the principal drycleaning solvent for a number of years becaues;

Addressing the hazards Comparing perc, then, to our list of considerations, we find that it fills the needs of drycleaners in almost all respects.

The key concerns are, as with any chemical, understanding the hazards. In this case understanding the toxicity issues and whether it is or is not a human carcinogen. To address these hazards, a perc-based process has to control emissions so that employees and the public get as little exposure as possible, thus minimizing the potential risk.

As far as toxicity is concerned, there is virtually no risk to employees or customers of a drycleaning plant when the solvent is handled properly. Most current regulations are based primarily on toxicology studies, including cancer studies, which were done on laboratory animals. However, different species of animals, including humans, metabolize chemicals differently. Thus, one cannot assume that a cancer effect in one animal species will predict cancer in another species without
understanding the metabolic processes in the species.

Perc producers, trade associations, industry experts and many independent scientists agree that when you consider all the available scientific evidence, there is no cancer risk to humans when perc is used properly. In fact, the science advisory board of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has concluded that "there is no compelling evidence of human cancer risk" for perc.
The practice of including an assessment of the metabolic differences of species is now acknowledged by regulators, and it is just now being included in the process regulators follow for risk assessments.

Producers of perchloroethylene, committed to the continued safe use of this solvent, support the industry in two ways. They are funding additional long term health studies which will ultimately help answer these complicated questions. They are also working with regulatory agencies to make sure that the most advanced scientific methods are used to evaluate perc.

 Janet Hickman is Dow's drycleaning industry development leader and perchloroethylene product steward. This article is based on a presentation she gave in Arizona last year. It was originally published in the summer 1997 issue of Dow's Spot News.

Alternative #1 - Green Clean
 

Alternative #2 - Dyrel Alternative #3 - Liquid Carbon Dioxide  
[What is PERC][Effect on Human Health][Effect On Env't Health][CitationList]


HOME